CMC in ELT: Hypotheses and Practices1
Dian Toar Y. G. Sumakul
The internet has changed the way people communicate. Specifically after the launch of Web 2. 0 technology, which brought on the introduction of various Online communities (SNSs), the speed of on the net interactions has grown. Now, people write even more in the internet. This kind of online articles are known as CMC, or Computer-Mediated Communication. Harnad (1991) labels CMC because th
the 4 innovation in human being communication, after language, producing, and printing. Furthermore, adding both used and created communication features, Beauvois (1998) labels it as вЂconversation in sluggish motion', when Crystal (2001) calls that вЂnetspeak'. Correspondingly, it is also viewed as the cross types (Kost, 2008) and bridge (Handley, 2010) of the two traditional settings of conversation: speaking and writing. This nature of CMC can now be the beginning point of the thought to bring CMC at the downroad of ELT (English Language Teaching), particularly of EFL (English as a Foreign Language) Teaching. This paper is intended to provide theoretical framework that support the usage of CMC in ELT. For this purpose, theories about CMC will probably be reviewed and findings by relevant study about the huge benefits of CMC in language learning will also be discussed. The second aim of this paper is to present practical recommendations of how CMC could be bundled in ELT. Within this range, examples of the utilization of CMC in ELT, by using a number of on the web tools, can also be elaborated.
Despite the fact that there are studies taking a look at how to use CMC (Computer Mediated Communication systems into sessions, one criticism to the notion of bringing these technologies in the classrooms is a nature with the CMC use itself. Though it is true the internet has been part of each of our students life, some studies suggest that the application of CMC tools for educational purposes continues to be minimum (Bosch, 2009; Selwyn, 2009; and Hew, 2011). Students make use of these net tools mostly for social needs. However , a more new study (Vrocharidou & Efthymiou, 2012) demonstrates that, although continue to little, you will find evidence that students previously use CMC technologies, including emails, SNSs (Social Networking Sites), and IMs (Instant Messagings) or perhaps online talks, for academics needs. Demirci (2007) also found that college students show confident perception on web-based exams. It is then the job with the language teachers to discover innovative and effective ways 1
A paper provided in FBS-LTC 2012 Intercontinental Seminar " Research in Teacher Education: What, How, and WhyвЂќ, 21-22 November 2012, Satya Wacana Christian University.
to cope with the nature of all their students to market and facilitate learning (Godwin-Jones, 2010). One other positive locating is also through Landu Betweenmaid (2012) talking about that EFL students has additionally used CMC on Facebook or myspace, for exercising their English. It is a prevalent phenomenon that foreign language scholars are exercising using the goal language by simply communicating with their very own teachers, peers, and local speakers at a distance. The ability from the language learners to collaborate, produce, and share articles or tips with other users might prove useful for language learning (Lomicka & Lord, 2009), which might likewise play significant role inside their second language acquisition (SLA). With all the fact that there are studies suggesting the concepts of taking on CMC solutions in educational uses and our pupils are already familiar with these systems, this conventional paper is aimed at two points. Initially, this paper will go over the root theories that supports the incorporation of CMC systems in vocabulary teaching and learning. Second, practical types of how these technologies have and could end up being utilised in English like a Foreign Language (EFL) classrooms can also be elaborated.
RELEVANT THEORETICAL AND RESEARCH BACKDROP
The Internet and Language Learning
The technology through the internet...
Recommendations: Anderson, B., Fagan, L., Woodnutt, To., & Chamorro-Premuzic, T. (2012). Facebook Psychology: Popular
Queries Answered by simply Research
Baran, B. (2010). Facebook being a formal educational environment. United kingdom Journal of Education Technology,
Batstone, Ur., & Ellis, R. (2009). Principled Sentence structure Teaching. System(37), 194-204.
Beauvois, M. They would. (1998). Interactions in Slow-motion: Computer-Mediated Connection in Overseas
Blattner, G., & Fiori, M. (2009). Facebook inside the Language Class: Promises and Possibilities. International
Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance education, 6(1), 17-28.
Bodomo, A. R. (2010). Computer-Mediated Interaction for Linguistics and Literacy. New York: Information
Bosch, Capital t. E. (2009). Using on-line social networking intended for teaching and learning: Facebook . com use in the university of
Chapelle, C. A. (2003). English Language Learning and Technology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins
Crystal, M. (2001). Vocabulary and the Net. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Crystal, Deb. (2011). Net Linguistics: A Student Guide. London, uk: Routledge.
Demirci, N. (2007). University Students ' Perceptions of Web-Based vs . Paper-Based Groundwork in a Standard
Physics Training course
Erlich, Z., Erlich-Philip, We., & Gal-Ezer, J. (2005). Skills necessary for participating in CMC courses: An Empirical
Godwin-Jones, Ur. (2010). Appearing Technologies: Literacies and Systems Revisited. Language Learning &
Technology, 14(3), 2-9.
Grosseck, G., Branb, R., & Tiruc, L. (2011). Dear instructor, what must i write on my wall? An instance study in
academic uses of Fb
Handley, Z. (2010, March 21). Pc Mediated Conversation: Bridging the gaps between writing and
Harnad, S. (1991). Post-Gutenberg Galaxy: The Fourth Wave in the Means of Production expertise.
Hew, T. F. (2011). Students ' and Professors ' Make use of Facebook. Personal computers and Human being Behaviour, twenty seven, 662-676.
Hyland, K. (2003). Second Language Publishing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Karpati, A. (2009). Web 2 technologies for Net Native language learners: a " Social CALL". ReCALL, 21(2), 139156.
Kasper, G. (1997). The role of pragmatics in language teaching education. In K. Bardovi-Harlig, & B. S. Hartford
(Eds. ), Beyond Strategies: Components of Secondary language Teacher Education (pp
Mat, C. L. (2008). Usage of Communication Approaches in a Synchronous CMC environment. In H. S. Magnan (Ed. ),
Mediating Task Online (pp
Lafford, G. A., & Lafford, B. A. (2005). CMC Technologies for Educating Foreign Languages: What is actually on the
Ecart? CALICO Log, 679-709.
Landu Amah, O. (2012). Code Mixing in CMC. Satya Wacana College of Foreign Languages, British Language and
Lomicka, L., & Lord, G. (2009). Introduction to online community, collaboration, and Web 2. zero tools. In L.
Lomaz, C. M. (2006). Situating CALL in the broader methodological context of foreign language instructing and
learning: Promises and possibilities
Mazer, J. P., Murphy, Ur. E., & Simonds, C. J. (2007). I'll See You on " FacebookвЂќ: The consequence of ComputerMediated Teacher Self-disclosure about Student Inspiration, Affective Learning, and Class room Climate.
Meskill, C., & Anthony, And. (2007). Form-focused Communicative Practice via CMC: What Language Learners
Miller, K. S., & Sullivan, K. P. (2006). Keystroke Logging: An intro. In E. P. Sullivan, & Electronic. Lindgren (Eds. ),
Computer system Keystroke Working and Writing: Methods and Applications (pp
Mills, And. (2010). Positioned Learning through Social Networking Residential areas: The Development of Joint
Enterprise, Mutual Engagement, and a Distributed Repertoire
Mollett, A., Moran, D., & Dunleavy, L. (2011). Applying Twitter in university study, teaching and impact
actions: A guide intended for academics and researchers
Motteram, G., & Sharma, L. (2009). Mixing up Learning within a Web 2. 0 World. Intercontinental Journal of Emerging
Systems & World, 7(2), 83-96.
Prensky, Meters. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. Coming, 9(5), 1-6.
Pritchard, A. (2007). Powerful Teaching with Internet Technologies. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
Promnitz-Hayashi, D. (2011). A Learning Success Story Applying Facebook. Studies in Self-Access Learning Diary,
Ratcham, S., & Firpo, D. (2011). Using Social Networking Technology to improve Learning in Higher Education:
A Case Study Applying Facebook
Roth, A. G. (2009). Subsequent Plato is Advice: Pedagogy and Technology for the Facebook Generation. Record of
Beliefs and History of Education, 59, 125-128.
Schwartz, H. D. (2010, January). Facebook, the brand new Classroom Commons? The Education Absorb, pp. 39-42.
Selwyn, N. (2009). Faceworking: Exploring students' education-related use of Facebook. Learning, Media and
Technology, 34(2), 157вЂ“174.
Shih, R. -C. (2011). Can easily Web 2. zero technology aid college students in mastering English producing? Integrating
Facebook or myspace and expert assessment with blended learning
Stevenson, M. P., & Liu, M. (2010). Learning a Vocabulary with Web 2. 0: Exploring the Use of Social network
Features of Foreign Language Learning Websites
Sumakul, G. T. (2011). EFL Students ' Communication Strategies in Coping with Grammatical Difficuties in
Sumakul, G. T. (2012). Facebook in Grammar Classes: A Look at a few EFL Classes in Dalam negri. The New British
Teacher, 6(1), 60-81.
Vrocharidou, A., & Efthymiou, I actually. (2012). Laptop mediated conversation for cultural and educational purposes:
Single profiles of use and University students' gratifications
Warschauer, M. (1995). Virtual Connections: Online Actions and Assignments for Network Language Learners.
Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice. The Modern
Vocabulary Journal, 81(4), 470-481.